For thousands of General Motors owners, the excitement of driving a high-performance 8-speed vehicle has been replaced by the ‘Chevy Shake,’ a violent transmission shudder that compromises both safety and vehicle longevity. General Motors has faced mounting litigation over alleged defects in the 8L45 and 8L90 transmissions, leaving consumers wondering if they are eligible for compensation and how to assert their legal rights. This guide provides an authoritative roadmap to help you understand the current status of the GM transmission class action, explore your eligibility, and master the steps required to join the lawsuit or secure a settlement. Whether you are currently experiencing mechanical failure or simply want to protect your investment, this comprehensive analysis details exactly how to navigate the legal landscape.
Identify Affected Models to Discover Your Eligibility
📤 Share Image
The first step in discovering your eligibility is identifying the specific hardware under the hood. The current litigation primarily targets two specific families of transmissions: the Hydra-Matic 8L45 and the 8L90 eight-speed automatic transmissions. These units were designed to provide better fuel economy and smoother shifting but have instead become synonymous with systemic mechanical failure. Over 800,000 vehicles manufactured by General Motors between 2015 and 2019 are currently estimated to be within the scope of this litigation.
The list of affected vehicles is extensive, crossing multiple brands under the GM umbrella. You must verify if your vehicle falls within the following range:
- • Chevrolet: 2015-2019 Silverado, Corvette, Camaro, and Colorado.
- • GMC: 2015-2019 Sierra, Canyon, and Yukon/Yukon XL.
- • Cadillac: 2015-2019 CTS, ATS, CT6, and Escalade/Escalade ESV.
Learn to recognize the symptoms that define the “Chevy Shake.” Owners frequently report a violent shuddering sensation that feels like driving over rumble strips, even on smooth pavement. Other common signs include significant hesitation during acceleration, harsh shifting in lower gears (especially from 1st to 2nd), and a sensation often described as “fish-biting” or a rhythmic tugging at highway speeds. For example, a 2017 Chevrolet Silverado owner may notice the truck “stumbling” when the transmission attempts to engage the torque converter clutch, while a Cadillac CT6 driver might experience an audible “clunk” and a physical jolt when downshifting while coming to a stop.
Don’t guess your eligibility. Use the 17-digit Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) found on your dashboard or driver’s side door jamb to check against active class lists. Lead counsel websites for cases like Speerly v. GM often provide search tools to explore whether your specific production date falls within the certified class periods.
It is essential to distinguish between the various lawsuits. While Speerly v. GM is the most prominent, subsequent filings and “copycat” lawsuits have emerged to expand the model year range or cover states not included in the original certification. Monitoring the specific court-appointed administrators for your region is the only way to ensure you are looking at the correct litigation scope.
Understand the Legal Grounds for the GM Transmission Litigation
To master the complexities of this case, you must understand the technical failure at its core. The central “Design Defect” allegation posits that the torque converter in the 8L45 and 8L90 transmissions fails to provide a smooth transition between gears. Plaintiffs argue that the friction materials within the torque converter clutch (TCC) do not mesh properly with the transmission fluid, causing internal friction and excessive heat. This mechanical disharmony results in the infamous shudder.
Technical Breakdown
Affected Trans Models
Primary TSB Number
The role of transmission fluid is a critical piece of evidence. General Motors released Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) #18-NA-355, which recommended a comprehensive fluid flush using a specific Mobil 1 Synthetic LV ATF HP fluid. However, litigation experts argue this was a “band-aid” fix. Plaintiffs allege that internal components generate metal shavings that circulate through the system, causing premature wear of the planetary gears and valve bodies. By the time many owners receive the fluid flush, internal physical damage has often already occurred.
From a legal standpoint, the case rests on several essential pillars:
Implied Warranty
The ‘Implied Warranty of Merchantability’ suggests a vehicle must be fit for safe operation. A defective transmission violates this core consumer right.
Diminished Value
Even if “repaired,” the vehicle’s resale value is permanently lowered because of the known defect history attached to the VIN.
Furthermore, the litigation cites the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, a federal law that protects consumers from deceptive warranty practices. GM allegedly knew about these defects through pre-release testing and internal data but continued to sell the vehicles without disclosing the risks to buyers. This alleged concealment forms the basis for consumer protection claims in states like California, Texas, and Michigan.
Master the Process of Joining the Class Action or Opting Out
A common misconception among beginner litigants is that you must “sign up” to be part of a class action. In reality, once a class is certified by a judge—as happened with the 26-state class in Speerly v. GM—all owners who fit the criteria are automatically Class Members. You do not need to take action to be included in the potential settlement; however, you do need to take action if you want to be an Active Plaintiff or if you wish to opt out.
📋
Steps to Manage Your Participation
Watch your mail for the official court-mandated notice. This document outlines your rights, the specific allegations, and critical deadlines.
If your vehicle has had multiple failed repair attempts, opting out of the class to pursue a private Lemon Law suit may yield a full buyback.
Visit the lead attorney’s database to register your contact information. This ensures you receive real-time updates on settlement negotiations.
Every class action has an “Exclusion Deadline.” If you do not formally opt out by this date, you lose the right to sue GM independently for these specific transmission issues. This is a critical trap for owners who wait too long to seek specialized legal advice.
Choosing between staying in the class and opting out is a nuanced decision. Consider this scenario: An owner with minor, occasional shuddering might find the convenience of a class settlement (usually cash or vouchers) preferable. Conversely, a driver with five failed transmission repairs—effectively leaving them with an undrivable vehicle—would likely benefit far more from an individual claim, which often results in a vehicle buyback plus attorney fees.
Document Your Experience to Support Your Claim
Whether you seek a class payout or an individual settlement, the strength of your claim rests entirely on evidence. You must compile a comprehensive service history that leaves no room for GM to argue that the issues were caused by poor maintenance or normal wear and tear.
Repair orders are the most vital documents in your file. Ensure that every time you visit a dealership, the technician notes specific keywords such as “shudder,” “hesitation,” or “transmission slip.” If a technician tells you the behavior is “normal,” insist that they document your complaint and their refusal to repair it in the official service record.
✅ Essential Documents
- All Dealer Repair Orders (ROs)
- Original Purchase/Lease Agreement
- Receipts for out-of-pocket flushes
- Towing and Rental Car receipts
- Video evidence of tachometer ‘hunting’
❌ Avoid These Mistakes
- Losing hard copies of repair records
- Accepting ‘verbal’ diagnostic results
- Missing court-mandated filing deadlines
- Modifying the transmission (voids claims)
- Ignoring TSB recall notices
Digital evidence can significantly bolster your case. Learn how to safely record a video of your dashboard while the shudder occurs. Often, you will see the tachometer needle “hunting” or fluctuating rapidly even when your foot is steady on the gas. This visual proof of RPM instability is a hallmark of torque converter slippage. Keep a detailed log of all communications with GM corporate or dealership service managers, noting dates, times, and the names of individuals who handled your case.
Data shows that claims with three or more documented repair attempts for the same transmission issue typically qualify for higher compensation tiers in automotive settlements. If you have hit this threshold, you are no longer a “beginner” claimant; you have a high-value case that requires meticulous preservation of every receipt and communication log.
Explore Potential Outcomes and Compensation Structures
What can you actually expect from the GM transmission litigation? While every case is unique, historical payout patterns from related drivetrain defects, such as the Vinci v. GM or Almquist cases, provide a clear roadmap for potential outcomes. Compensation is typically structured in tiers based on the severity of the defect and the number of repair attempts.
Commonly, settlements include a mandatory warranty extension specifically for the defective 8L45 or 8L90 components. This might extend coverage to 10 years or 150,000 miles, providing peace of mind for those who choose to keep their vehicles. Some settlements also offer vouchers toward the purchase of a new GM vehicle, though cash is often the preferred remedy for class members.
In severe cases, you may qualify for a “Buyback Program.” This is where General Motors is forced to repurchase the vehicle at the original price, minus a usage offset based on the mileage at the time of the first repair attempt. Discover if your state’s laws allow for “loss of use” compensation, which provides cash payments for every day your vehicle sat in the repair shop. In similar automotive class actions, these payments can add up significantly, reflecting the true burden the defect placed on your daily life.
To navigate this process successfully, you must verify your vehicle’s VIN and transmission model (8L45/8L90) to confirm inclusion in the 2015-2019 model year litigation. Meticulously document all repair attempts and service communications to build a robust evidence file for future claims. Finally, stay informed on court deadlines for the Speerly v. GM case to decide whether to remain in the class or opt-out for an individual lawsuit. Check your VIN today against the official litigation database and consult with a consumer protection attorney to protect your right to a functioning vehicle.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the specific symptoms of a defective GM 8-speed transmission?
Owners typically report a distinct ‘shudder’ or vibration often compared to driving over rumble strips. Other symptoms include delayed engagement when shifting into Drive or Reverse, violent ‘clunks’ during downshifts, and a sensation of the vehicle being ‘hit’ from behind when accelerating from a stop.
Do I need to hire my own lawyer to join the class action?
If you remain part of the certified class, the court-appointed lead counsel represents your interests at no out-of-pocket cost to you. However, if your vehicle has undergone significant repairs or you want to pursue a full buyback, you may choose to hire a private attorney to opt-out and sue GM individually.
Is there a deadline to join the GM transmission lawsuit?
Class actions have specific ‘Opt-Out’ or ‘Exclusion’ deadlines determined by the court once a settlement is reached or the class is certified. It is critical to monitor official notices sent via mail or posted on the settlement administrator’s website to ensure you do not miss these legally binding dates.
What if I no longer own the vehicle; can I still join?
Yes, former owners and lessees are typically included in the class if they owned or leased the affected vehicle during the class period and suffered financial loss, such as paying for repairs or selling the vehicle at a diminished value due to the known transmission defect.
Has General Motors already settled the 8-speed transmission lawsuit?
As of late 2023 and early 2024, several major cases, including Speerly v. GM, have moved through class certification stages. While some regional settlements or individual buybacks have occurred, a nationwide ‘master’ settlement is still a subject of ongoing litigation and negotiation in the federal court system.
